On the other hand, some, such as Melvin Eisenberg, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, suggest that duty of care and loyalty is not enough to cover good faith, so it is an independent obligation: “Duty of care and loyalty do not cover all kinds of inappropriate behavior on the part of executives, certain types of management offences that do not fall within these obligations. Different rules limit an AIFM`s liability under the duty of care and loyalty, and these restrictive rules do not apply to conduct contrary to the duty of good faith. “On this basis, an obligation of good faith can be seen as a promotion of fairness, as it means that the majority cannot act arbitrarily simply because it is in the majority. Many partnerships have sophisticated decision-making processes, including the need to strengthen the majority of resolutions that address issues of particular importance. This provides valuable protection, but may not be enough to protect those unfairly treated. In such circumstances, an obligation of good faith may give the persons concerned a possible remedy. If there is a dispute about the existence of a partnership, for those who claim that the partnership exists, it is to prove that it does, and it is quite possible that the date indicated in the written partnership agreement (if any) is the best evidence available. It is important to keep in mind that a traditional partnership does not have a clear legal identity. Instead, all partners must jointly assume responsibility for the debts incurred by the company. This means that if you are in a traditional partnership, your personal wealth may be compromised for any outstanding debts that you or your partners will incur during the operation. And is still due by an outgoing partner to the partnership after dissolution, until the company is dissolved the partners owe fiduciary duties to each other, that is, a duty of trust and extreme faith, that is, to act honestly with the other partners, to act for the good of the partners as a whole, not to put themselves in a situation, in which their duty to the company and its own interests are in conflict to fully disclose all facts relevant to the partners and not to obtain unauthorized personal profit. The duty extends to negotiations leading to the creation of the partnership and, after the dissolution of the partnership, it is always due to a partner leaving the partnership until the company is dissolved. .