Garrett and Carson use their Spidey sense to navigate Far from Home.
Samuel L. Jackson
Captain Marvel has finally joined the Marvel Cinematic Universe! Brie Larson headlines as Carol Danvers in this historical debut. Brie is a great fit to play Captain Marvel, but she is only scratching the surface of the character in this film. Largely in part to the relatively inexperienced directors who somehow convinced Marvel Studios they were ready for a movie of this magnitude. They weren’t, and it shows.
As a fan of comic books and Captain Marvel, I had been looking forward to this movie for a long time (even before the pager). I knew there was a need to do some adjusting from the source material going into the movie. Carol Danvers has such a complex and convoluted backstory that there is no way to do it justice in under 10 hours. The simplification of the origin story was necessary, but not some of the changes to fit the social narrative of this movie. Mainly everything to do with Annette Bening needs to be omitted and changed back to their original script. I am sure Annette is a very nice lady, but she does not belong in this movie in any capacity.
Captain Marvel needed to show why Carol Danvers is a complete bad-ass. It needed to let Brie Larson be that bad-ass. The action scenes were too confined, few and far between, and hard to tell what was going on. Captain Marvel has such a grand power-set that having her fight in a tiny room truly limits how awesome she can be. The emotional core of this movie also misfires as attention on young Carol should have been front and center to give more weight and motivation. These two directors shoulder the blame on what should have been an epic introduction. An incredible actress like Brie in the hands of the Russos has limitless potential. Avengers: End Game will be her true introduction into the MCU.
A solid entry, somewhat cookie cutter entry into the Marvel cinematic universe with strong performances that make it a cut above most other Marvel origin stories.
Glass. The conclusion of M. Night Shyamalan’s Unbreakable Trilogy left the audience wanting more. Not from a “can’t wait to see the next movie” sense, but more of a “really, that’s it?” sense. Shyamalan is known for his brilliantly laid-out, thought provoking, one-of-a-kind works of art. He is as equally known for his confusing, dull, wastes-of-time. Glass falls somewhere in the middle.
The world built in the Unbreakable Trilogy is an interesting one. It is a world on the cusp of being introduced to super heroes and villains. These are a very different type of comic book movies than the Marvel and DC films we are getting today. These are grounded in reality. Character driven. Dark and gritty. Slow moving with few action sequences. This technique worked really well in Unbreakable, it was good in Split, and it was just boring in Glass. With this cast, these characters, these backstories, and this director, the stage was set for Glass to be something legendary.
The most disappointing thing about Glass is the expectation that Shyamalan had a grand design for this trilogy from the start. That he had some ingenious way of bringing these worlds together into this epic unexpected conclusion. Perhaps it is unfair to continue to hold Shyamalan to his previous greatness. He established a reputation early that he has not been able to live up to since. I believe he is truly a victim of his own success. Very few directors are held to such a high standard. The ending of Split teased us that he might still have something left in the tank. That he could still pull one over on the audience just like the good old days. Unfortunately, Glass did not deliver on those expectations and Shyamalan remains a shadow of his former self. Glass is not a bad movie, just wasted potential.